In the classical liberal tradition, the free market economy constitutes a central pillar of a free and just society. Economic freedom allows for innovation, creativity, and the pursuit of new ideas, which collectively foster prosperity and human flourishing. History has shown that when people are free to experiment, trade, and invest, they tend to discover new solutions to old problems, raising the standard of living for themselves and others. When those same individuals possess property rights that ensure they can reap the rewards of their efforts, the incentives to innovate become even stronger. This combination of freedom and security is what leads to widespread prosperity.
Entrepreneurial discovery is at the heart of this dynamic. In a free market, prices act as signals, reflecting the supply and demand for goods and services, and guiding entrepreneurs toward unmet needs and opportunities. This decentralized system of decision-making allows individuals to use their unique knowledge and skills to find solutions that a central authority could never fully anticipate. Government, in this view, plays an essential but limited role: it should provide the legal infrastructure that supports this system—protecting property rights, enforcing contracts, and ensuring a stable environment in which voluntary exchange can flourish.
In a free market, prices act as signals, reflecting the supply and demand for goods and services, and guiding entrepreneurs toward unmet needs and opportunities.
Public policy that interferes with this process tends to impede economic growth and innovation. When the government imposes controls on prices, restricts trade, or otherwise interferes with voluntary exchange, it distorts the signals that entrepreneurs rely on to make decisions. These distortions often lead to inefficiencies, reduced productivity, and lower standards of living. They also produce vested interests in rent-seeking—the manipulation of government policy for corrupt purposes—which serves the few at the expense of the common good. Economic freedom, then, is not just an abstract principle but a practical necessity for fostering the conditions that lead to human progress.
Economic Freedom
Artwork commissioned by the Institute for Humane Studies
Hayek and the Knowledge Problem
Friedrich Hayek, one of the foremost liberal thinkers of the twentieth century, provided a key insight into why economic freedom is so vital. In his famous essay, The Use of Knowledge in Society, Hayek explained what has come to be known as the “knowledge problem.” In essence, the knowledge required to make effective economic decisions is dispersed among millions of individuals, each of whom possesses their own specific knowledge about local conditions, preferences, and opportunities. No central authority, no matter how well-informed, can possibly gather all the information necessary to make efficient economic decisions for everyone.
No central authority, no matter how well-informed, can possibly gather all the information necessary to make efficient economic decisions for everyone.
This decentralized nature of knowledge is why markets work so well. Prices, as Hayek pointed out, act as a kind of information system, conveying signals about supply and demand to everyone participating in the market. When the price of a commodity rises, it tells producers that there is an opportunity to profit by supplying more of it. When prices fall, it signals that resources should be redirected elsewhere. This process happens naturally, without the need for a central planner, and allows society to make use of dispersed knowledge far more efficiently than any government intervention could.
This view is often dismissed as oversimplified “Economics 101,” and indeed many nuances and complications can arise, as Hayek himself recognized. But at its core, the price system is indispensable, and suppressing its role as a kind of information system amounts to a kind of censorship. When governments attempt to control the economy through central planning, they inevitably run into the knowledge problem.
Even with the best intentions, central planners cannot know enough to set prices correctly, allocate resources efficiently, or predict which innovations will succeed. As a result, economic controls often lead to unintended consequences, such as shortages, surpluses, and misallocated resources. Hayek’s point was that the complexity of an economy far exceeds the ability of any one person or group to manage it effectively. The only way to solve the knowledge problem is to allow individuals the freedom to make their own decisions based on the information available to them.
The Role of Government in a Free Economy
While liberals argue for economic freedom, they also recognize that government has an important role to play in supporting the conditions necessary for that freedom to thrive. The government’s primary function in a market economy is to provide the legal infrastructure that underpins voluntary exchange. This includes protecting property rights, enforcing contracts, and ensuring the rule of law is upheld. Without these basic protections, economic freedom would be impossible, as individuals would lack the security needed to invest, trade, or innovate.
The government’s primary function in a market economy is to provide the legal infrastructure that underpins voluntary exchange.
For example, property rights are essential for encouraging entrepreneurship and investment. If individuals do not have secure ownership over their land, capital, or intellectual property, they have little incentive to engage in long-term projects that might not yield immediate returns. Property rights give people the confidence that they will be able to reap the rewards of their efforts, which in turn encourages them to take risks, experiment with new ideas, and invest in their future.
Similarly, the enforcement of contracts is crucial for maintaining trust in economic relationships. When people enter into voluntary exchanges, they need to know that the agreements they make will be honored. If contracts could be broken with impunity, the entire basis of market transactions would be undermined. The government’s role in enforcing contracts ensures that individuals can engage in complex, long-term economic relationships with confidence.
Beyond these basic functions, government should avoid unnecessary interference in the market. Policies that restrict voluntary exchange, impose price controls, or create barriers to entrepreneurship only serve to impede economic growth. Such interventions distort the signals that entrepreneurs rely on, making it harder for them to discover new opportunities and respond to changing market conditions. By contrast, when individuals are free to engage in mutually beneficial exchanges, the market becomes a dynamic ecosystem of innovation and discovery. Interventions of this sort should require a high bar of justification, and even when arguably necessary it is always preferable to use the least restrictive means available, aiming to minimize these harmful distortions.
The Link Between Economic and Political Freedom
Economic freedom is not just a driver of prosperity—it is a vital safeguard for political freedom. The two are deeply intertwined. Without the ability to control one’s own economic choices, individuals are left vulnerable to political coercion and control. Economic independence provides the foundation for individual autonomy, and without it political rights and civil liberties are hollowed out.
Consider what happens in a society where the government exercises extensive control over the economy. When the state holds the power to allocate resources, set wages, or decide who can start a business, it holds immense leverage over the individual. Those who challenge political authority may find themselves cut off from economic opportunities, denied the right to work, or have their property confiscated. In such a system, political dissent becomes dangerous because it threatens not just one’s liberty, but one’s livelihood.
When the state controls the means of production and individuals have no sphere of personal autonomy, the state becomes the only arbiter of who gets what. Political power and economic power become concentrated in the same hands, and the freedom to express dissent or pursue alternative views becomes severely restricted. Economic dependence on the state makes people reluctant to criticize government policies or leaders, knowing that doing so could result in personal financial ruin.
A person who can freely earn a living, own property, and engage in voluntary trade is less dependent on the whims of politicians.
In contrast, economic freedom disperses power and creates a buffer between individuals and the state. A person who can freely earn a living, own property, and engage in voluntary trade is less dependent on the whims of politicians. This economic independence empowers individuals to speak their minds, challenge authority, and participate fully in the political process. In a society that respects economic freedom, political freedom thrives because individuals have the resources and autonomy to resist overreach and hold their leaders accountable.
Thus, economic freedom is not just an engine of material prosperity; it is a pillar of political liberty. Without it, the ability to exercise political rights is significantly weakened, making economic freedom a prerequisite.
By supporting IHS, you invest in scholars at a formative stage in their careers. Not only with crucial financial support, but with inspiration and connections to other like-minded and driven intellectual collaborators that they can’t find from any other funder.
